UEFA PresidentΒ Aleksander Ceferin last night moved to defend the decision to award the Europa League final to Azerbaijan, whilst simultaneously taking aim at English clubs.
Chelsea 4-1 Arsenal
After a campaign packed with goals, drama and high-quality football all-round, Premier League giants Arsenal and Chelsea eventually emerged as the Europa Leagueβs finest early last month, before going head-to-head in the tournamentβs finale on the 29th of May.
Both sides headed into proceedings in search of their first silverware of the season, with Arsenal having required a win to secure Champions League football for next season.
Chelsea boss Maurizio Sarri, meanwhile, entered the clash with his sights firmly set on the first title of his managerial career.
And, when all was said and done, Sarri put his trophy-less past behind him, in emphatic fashion.
A second-half demolition on the part of the Blues eventually saw Chelsea put their London rivals to the sword by 4 goals to 1.
Eden Hazard (2), Olivier Giroud and Pedro did the damage, as the Pensioners showcased their class when it mattered most.
Baku controversy
The on-pitch action two weeks ago, however, only accounted for a minute fraction of the talk surrounding the Europa League final.
The main talking point regarded the location of the showcase, with UEFA having surprised the masses when announcing their decision to hold the clash in Baku, the capital city of Azerbaijan.
The choice on the part of European footballβs governing body had far-reaching consequences, with neither Arsenal or Chelsea having managed to fill their dismal ticket allocations, resulting in a hugely-underwhelming atmosphere.
In addition, Arsenal were without Henrikh Mkhitaryan for the matchup, as political tensions between Azerbaijan and Mkhitaryanβs native Armenia over the disputedΒ Nagorno-Karabakh region saw the attacking midfielder opt against travelling with Unai Emeryβs squad.
UEFA, though, do not appear at all regretful regarding their decision to award the final to Azerbaijan.
Speaking last nightΒ during a talk at Oxford University, presidentΒ Aleksander Ceferin stood firmly by UEFAβs opting for Baku, citing the need to develop football throughout Europe, as opposed to handing all major showpieces to the likes of England and Germany.
Regarding the heavy complaints over the host city,Β Ceferin also took the opportunity to take aim at English clubs, suggesting that the actions of the Premier Leagueβs heavyweights βdonβt help their popularity within European footballβ:
βI was supported by 76 per cent of the (European) federations in my first (UEFA) election but not England. England supported the other candidate.β
Whenever we have English clubs, whenever we have complaints, theyβre mad! You donβt help yourself in the popularity within European football with that. If somebody asks me why we played in Baku, I would say: βPeople live there. Homo sapiens live there.β
βThey had to watch the game at 11pm because of the time difference but nobody complained.β
βIf we have two Azerbaijani teams playing in London nobody would complain. They would come and play without any problems. We decided a year and a half ago that we play in Baku, which has a modern stadium of 70,000. I think there is only one stadium in England that is bigger.β
βSo you should see the happiness, the humbleness of people when they see live the superstars they like. We have to develop football everywhereβ¦ not England, Germany only.β